Based on LD-UD-D ʟR ʀ, it should be leftįoot on down. One way to look at it is that UD has conflictingįooting cues from each side: Based on L ʟD ʀ-UD-DR, it shouldīe left foot on U. As predicted by the theory, LD-UD-DR is an awkward double-step.For example LR-UD-LR can do footing for UD any which way. When footings remain ambiguous, they're equally easy to do either.In the rest, the footwork is completely determined by the UD remains ambiguous in only two cases (preceded by LR or You can prove to yourself that if UD follows one of the other sixĭouble-arrow combinations, its footwork is often completely. ![]() Transition is D ʟR ʀ-D ʟU ʀ, which satisfies all the Principle says D ʟR ʀ-U ʟD ʀ would be bad because the leftįoot would go from D to U in a single step. The footing on UD is initiallyĪmbiguous on its own: U ʟD ʀ or U ʀD ʟ? But the min-spin
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |